Chor Chor Super Chor
Synopsis:
In the crowded bylanes of old Delhi, Shuklaji runs a small photo studio as a facade for small time crime. Over the years he has groomed a bunch of youngsters in the art of pick pocketing and petty crime. Satbir, a gang member, wants to give up a life of vice and make a fresh beginning. He bumps into Neena on his first respectable job assignment and falls for her.
Meanwhile another crook Amol and his gang of slow-witted goons are on the look out for smart men to enlist in their crew. He has his eye on Ronnie, one of Shukla’s protégés, but Shukhla seems too big an obstacle to surmount. Ronnie however, has had it with the low budget stuff and can’t wait to hit the big game. While, Ronnie finds admission in Amol’s gang at the behest of kidnapping a diamond merchant, Purshottam Das, Satbir on the other hand takes to a clean life and pursues Neena. Curious about Satbir’s connections, Neena asks him about his cronies and if she could watch them live in action. Though hesitant at first, Satbir gives in to her request just to win her over
Totally smitten by Neena, Satbir shows her real instances of pickpockets on their job, Neena although has totally different agenda under her mellifluous innocence. What happens next are witty comical situations forming a complex jigsaw puzzle.
What does Neena have up her sleeves? Will Satbir finally win Neena? What happens to Amol and Ronnie? Will Satbir be able to stash the life of crime? It explores Delhi’s grey underbelly in a spleen bursting satirical comedy.
Deepak Dobriyal holds a bottle of cheap mineral water in the opening twenty minutes of Chor Chor Super Chor with the kind of specific, twitchy care that usually belongs to documentaries about people who fix typewriters in old railway stations, and if I am honest, that little bit of business is better than half the scripts making the rounds in Bollywood these days. He plays Satbir, a petty thief whose ambitions rarely rise above the level of stealing car stereos from unattended hatchbacks in south Delhi parking lots, but there is an exhaustion behind his quick-shouldered walk that suggests he has been running the same thirty-foot perimeter for a decade without ever managing to vault the wall. The film itself, directed by Keshhav Prapatsa with a sort of scruffy indifference to narrative momentum, settles into the same low-frequency hum as its protagonist, neither rushing toward some grand moral comeuppance nor lingering too long on the poverty it uses for backdrop. It is a small Hindi movie made without the safety net of high-concept ironies or glossy diaspora packaging, which means it has to survive entirely on the awkward friction between people who know they are losing.
The screenplay by Prapatsa and his collaborators refuses to treat criminality as a lifestyle choice with cool leather jackets, opting instead for the endless, grinding humiliation of small-scale operations that net just enough cash to pay for bad tea and broken spark plugs. Anshul Kataria as Deepak plays the younger, more excitable partner with a nervous energy that sometimes overshoots the room, yet his scenes with Priya Bathija generate a prickly, irritable domesticity that feels lived-in rather than workshopped. They argue about grocery money while sitting on a stained mattress under a ceiling fan that sounds like a drying machine full of loose coins, and nobody stops to deliver a monologue about the widening gulf between the rich and the poor in modern urban India. Instead, the dialogue drops words, stumbles over pronouns, and sounds like the stuff people actually say when they are too tired to finish their sentences. There is a supporting turn by Alok Chaturvedi that is clearly looped in a tiny studio with terrible acoustics, and that sudden shift from production sound to dry, floating ADR right in the middle of a street argument bugged me more than any plot hole.
Cinematographer Sachin K. Krishn shoots the alleys and cramped rooms with a naturalistic grey light that avoids the tourist-board grime of so many contemporary Hindi films, finding instead the dull beige of government offices and the greasy yellow of single-bulb kitchens. The camera rarely moves when it doesn't have to, preferring to watch Dobriyal fold a stolen jacket into a square with the methodical precision of an accountant who lost his ledger. Yet the soundtrack keeps dropping this heavy, low-register bass thrum during transition scenes that belongs in an entirely different movie about bank heists and international syndicates, an obvious shortcut to tension that the actual images on screen are too quiet to require. It feels like someone sitting in the editing suite panicked every four minutes and decided the audience needed a reminder that crime was happening, even when the characters were just sitting on a curb sharing a cigarette.
Paru Uma brings a grounded, quiet gravity to her role as the woman who watches these men cycle through their pathetic little schemes with a face that registers less disappointment than absolute, numbing predictability. She reminds me a bit of Seema Biswas in Bandit Queen, not because the characters are similar, but because both actresses possess that rare ability to look like they have lived off lentils and tap water for twenty years before the camera ever started rolling. The ensemble fills out with Jagat Rawat and Chandrahas Tiwari as various shades of middle-aged desperation, men whose faces look like crumpled paper left in a pocket through a heavy wash cycle. Bramha Mishra and Shrikant Verma turn up in smaller spots, adding texture to a world where everyone is trying to sell someone else a rusted alternator that probably doesn't fit a Maruti 800.
There is no grand philosophy here about the rot at the heart of the capital or the spiritual emptiness of the consumer class, thank God. The thematic weight, such as it is, stays stubbornly small, tangled up in the logistics of pawning a stolen mobile phone before the battery dies and the shopkeeper realizes the screen is cracked. Anurag Arora handles his scenes with a blunt force that keeps the narrative from drifting into whimsy, because Prapatsa sometimes flirts with that annoying indie habit of treating losers as poets of the asphalt. They are not poets. They are just annoying, slightly desperate people who smell like cheap tobacco and make terrible life choices on a Tuesday afternoon.
The film sags in the middle hour when it tries to construct a proper plot out of a double-cross involving a stash of fake watches that nobody could possibly mistake for real ones, losing that observational shagginess that makes the first forty minutes work so well. Yet even during those mechanical stretches, Dobriyal's shoulders remain slumped at exactly the right angle of defeat, a physical choice that anchors the picture long after the script starts running on fumes. It does not reinvent the caper, and it certainly doesn't offer any comfort about the state of the world outside the frame, ending instead on a note of grey, unresolved fatigue that feels entirely honest to the people it spends its ninety minutes watching.